The Traveling Widower

Tag: camera

  • Arches & Astrophotography – Random Thoughts

    Star-filled night sky above rock formations with the Milky Way visible.

    April 24th, 2026

    Time for one of those mind dumps of all the odd thoughts that have crossed my mind this past week.

    Astrophotography

    I’ve never been more than just mildly interested in astronomy – I like looking at starry skies, and can pick out one or two constellations, but I rarely go out of my way to look for comets, satellites, eclipses or any other astronomical event. The same goes for night sky photography – I’ve never been able to even get a good shot of a full moon, and have never made much of an effort to learn how to do that. Last summer was my first attempt, when I spent an evening at a (mostly) dark sky state park (Mitchell Lake)  up in the Sierra, to photograph the Milky Way. I did some Google/Youtube research, and made a few reasonably good shots without really understanding what I was doing. So when I saw the workshop description in a Mike’s Camera e-mail, I thought it might be nice to get some education and hands-on experience, in a National Park that is on my bucket-list to visit. Here’s my thoughts on this rather specialized category of photography, after my five day deep dive:

    • This is probably the most technical genre of photography that I’ve been exposed to so far (yes, another intended pun). You really need to understand low-light photography, the relationships between ISO, aperture and shutter speed, how images are stored on sensors, and all the bells and whistles that your camera has and how to use them. You cannot just set your camera on fully automatic, and hope for the best, even with the new AI features in the latest offerings from the camera manufacturers. Someone asked me what my Kelvin settings were….I knew at that point that I was in trouble.
    • Adobe Lightroom (or an equivalent image processing software package) is mandatory once you have captured an image, no matter how good your camera is. And, you need to have more than just basic experience with the software to produce anything worthwhile unless you are really lucky. Example of luck: a passing car light painted the Balanced Rock as I was shooting. Came out pretty nice. 
    • It’s really incredibly dark in designated dark sky locations – you need to be able to work your camera and tripod without light. And you need to be comfortable with walking down potentially rough paths with minimal lighting from red-light headlamps. If you have balance issues (I do – really awful neuropathy), a hiking stick will be a must – it is easy to lose your balance when you are standing in the dark, and it is easy to trip and fall even when you are simply shuffling in place. Unfortunately, one person in our group did take a fall one night – she did some damage, but was able to continue on that evening, and for the rest of the workshop. A dedicated photographer!
    • And not only will it be pitch-black dark, depending on the time of year and what you are focusing on (ex. Milky Way, meteor showers, etc.) you will likely be up way past your usual bedtime. Get used to staying up until the wee hours of the morning, and learning how to nap for a few hours during the day. You never really catch up on sleep until the trip is over.
    • Another thought struck me the other day, related to the dependency on post processing tools such as Adobe Lightroom. There is a great deal of artistic creativity involved in generating those beautiful star and Milky Way photographs you see in magazines and galleries. You really do not get that with the naked eye, at least in the two locations where I’ve recently seen the Milky Way. So much depends on the sensor in the camera, and how the camera stores all that information down to the pixel level. Our eyes and brain cannot do what the camera and computer can do to process that information. When you process the image with Adobe Lightroom, you are adding (or removing) colors, adding brightness to the stars, accentuating the colors and brightness of the Milky Way core, and even bringing out some of the detail of the foreground, which is completely dark to the naked eye, and underexposed in the image. Some post-processing is considered kosher in club competitions and contests – but it just seems like the processing required to make a starry sky shot really pop is pushing the limits.

    Some thoughts on the Workshop 

    I’ve done a few hands-on photography trips before, but these were all one day and done, not multi-day with significant travel requirements like this one. I was not sure what to expect, but this definitely exceeded all expectations both known and unknown. The trip was offered through Mike’s Camera, but organized and run by a photographer who has his own workshop company, specializing in all aspects of night-time, low-light photography. I do not normally advertise for anyone, but this one was special:

    Image 10 Photographic – www.image10photographic.com, run by Craig Wennersten

    He is a veritable fountain of knowledge when it comes to low light photography, and works closely with each member of the group, no matter what their experience level is with their equipment. He plans out each evening, based on his knowledge of the area, the weather conditions, and from mapping out the times the stars will be positioned at each location to get the best photographs possible. Craig runs workshops for the Milky Way, Northern Lights and other astrophotography experiences. Check his Web site out if you are interested in a great learning experience.

    OK, end of advertisement. I’m not getting paid for it – just thought he was a great guy and with all the tens of viewers I have on this blo, it might be nice to give him some free blogosphere visibility.

    What was really different for me, as I mentioned in a previous blog, was to be on a trip where the focus was entirely on photography, with a bunch of fellow ‘gear heads’. The National Geographic/Lindblad trips typically have a number of semi-serious photographers, and their is always a NG photographer on board who are more than willing to provide guidance and advice – but this workshop was a non-stop learning experience for me. I now have a much improved understanding of many of the features of my Sony A7R5, as well as more than just the basics on setting ISO, shutter speed and F-stop for low lighting situations.

    We also spent a lot of time discussing (and using) Adobe Lightroom Classic, for post processing. Craig has a very detailed workflow for processing Milky Way images, which he demonstrated (using one of my shots) in one of our afternoon sessions, and then shared a document which describes each step of the workflow in detail. Absolutely invaluable information. It is absolutely amazing what you can do to a RAW image with this application, especially once you gain some expertise with all the features.

    As an example of novice vs. expert, here is my first attempt at post processing (top), versus what Craig was able to do in a few minutes (bottom). Mine was OK, but his really brought out the color and increased the contrast between the dark sky and the stars.

    Silhouette of a towering rock formation against a starry night sky with the Milky Way visible.
    A night sky filled with stars and the Milky Way, featuring striking rock formations in the foreground illuminated by faint red light.

    Moab and Arches National Park

    I was really impressed with Moab – yeah, it’s extremely touristy with lots of tacky souvenir shops and 4-wheel adventure tour companies, but then there are lots of really good restaurants and brew pubs (can’t say that from experience though), multiple ice cream/gelato shops (tried four of them, yum), and lots of nice hotels. There’s even a parking lot for food trucks. This is usually the kind of place I try to avoid, but I kind of liked the place. 

    It seems like every time I go to a national park that I’ve never been to before, I forget all the other parks I’ve been to and it becomes my new favorite. This time was no different. I spent the better part of seven days, day and night, wandering through ANP, and did not have the time to explore much beyond the parking lots. I also missed out on sunrises, which should be spectacular with all the red rock formations, and would love to see more sunsets as well. I will not cross this off my bucket list yet – I really do want to return again. But spend more time when the sun is out. 

    Highs and Lows 

    Best Day Overall – probably the Monday everyone else left. I did not enjoy being alone, but I was able to see a lot of the park during the day, did some hiking, had time for a dip in the spa, and had perfect weather for my solo Milky Way shoot that night.

    Worst Mistake – not checking out my selected setup spot at the Sand Dune Arch. I should have noticed that the two trail signs would wind up in my photos. All I had to do was find a spot a 20 feet away in either direction. Duh. Fortunately, I can sort of hide the signs with post processing. A close second was my major, time wasting goof when we were shooting for a star trace, sitting in the car for an hour without confirming that my camera was actually taking photos.

    Best Arch – well, I did not see them all, but I thought the Double Arch was the most impressive. I’d like to have seen that at sunrise or sunset, and perhaps done a night session there as well. Maybe next time. 

    Best Ice Cream – tough choice, the four I tried were all good. The Moab Coffee Shop had the best gelato though. The Spoke Center restaurenat had excellent ice cream (Orange Creamsicle).

    Worst Conditions – Friday night – the sky was clear, but the temperatures dropped down way past my threshold. That was my other mistake – I prepared for rain, not for cold weather. I wound up buy a set of thermals and even with those extra layers, I had to bail out before the last session. I was numb.

    Best Hike – that’s easy since I only did a few. The Landscape Arch trail. Great views along the way, and a nice workout. I really wanted to do the length of Park Avenue, but ran out of time and energy.

    Best Milky Way Location – another tough choice. I’ll take the Balanced Rock as my favorite since it’s a narrow, impressive feature and you can get the MW centered above it.

    Good Health News – no cardiac issues at all!

    Not so good health news – Hiking during the day on even paths is OK, as long as I’m careful. Rock scrambling is a problem for me now – I had to be very careful in the Double Arch area, and was too wobbly around the Garden of Eden to go very far. And standing still in the dark is a problem – I had to hold on to the tripod at times. Neuropathy sucks.

    Summary – Overall, a really great trip – fantastic scenery, fun group of people, excellent trip lead and a great learning experience. 

    And if you made it this far reading this post, here are a bunch of curated photos.

    A starry night sky with the Milky Way visible above rugged rock formations and a dark landscape.
    Silhouette of rock formations under a starry night sky with clouds.
    Night sky filled with stars and the Milky Way above dark rock formations.
    Silhouetted rock formations under a starry night sky with the Milky Way visible.
    A starry night sky featuring the Milky Way, with large rock formations silhouetted in the foreground.
    A night sky filled with countless stars, with a gradient of colors towards the horizon. The landscape below features silhouettes of desert terrain and shrubs under the starlit sky.
    A panoramic view of a rocky landscape under a starry night sky, showcasing a dramatic rock formation illuminated by soft lighting.

  • More Antarctica Photography

    December 18th, 2025

    A majestic snow-capped mountain rises against a clear blue sky, surrounded by calm waters with floating icebergs in the foreground.

    After two full weeks of puttering around the house, I finally dedicated a day to go through the two 500GB SD cards that I used for the Sony A7 cameras (A7IV, A7RV) on the Antarctica trip. Most of the images I have posted so far on the blog or Facebook, were captured with my phone, with a smattering of images from the cameras from a cursory pass I made of the SD cards while still traveling. I’ve just been lazy, putting this task off until yesterday. 

    This turned into a significant effort:

    1. Each card had at least 1300 separate images, each with a JPEG and RAW version. You can shoot a lot with 10 frames-per-second.
    2. I first went through each of the JPEG versions, deleting duplicates or images that I knew I’d never do anything with. Digital cameras are wonderful – unlike film, it costs nothing to take a lot of lousy shots. But if you take hundreds of images, you still have to review each one. 
    3. After going through the JPEG versions, I used the list of remaining JPEG’s to compare with the RAW images, and delete the same files. Once that was done, I then did a backup of the remaining images to my two archive drives. I will probably need a new, dedicated archive drive sometime in the near future. More toys. 
    4. Phew!  That was a lot of work. I decided I needed a glass of wine after that. 

    The end result of this process is about 650 images that need a more detailed review – still a lot, but much better than 2600, and all of them are pretty darn good. Some are amazing, and really capture the vastness, magnificence and beauty of the ice covered Antarctic landscape. And of course, there were more fun images of penguins. 

    So now I have to work on the remaining batch images, and determine which ones I want to submit for club competitions, print on acrylic (I’m turning my house into a photo gallery), or just share with friends and family (and everyone else) on the blog. I’ll probably take my time on this, but will eventually wind up with about 50 or so, “keepers”. Maybe more. A lot more. I might wind up just putting together a digital photo book for the trip, and post that on the blog.

    I have also started reviewing some of the videos I shot with my phone and the Sony A7IV camera. I have just started dabbling with video this past year, first with the GoPro, and just recently with my latest Pixel phone. I had never used the slow motion or time lapse feature that are available on both iPhone and Android cameras – fun stuff. I also tried out video on the Sony camera once or twice on the trip, since it is supposed to be one of the best features of this camera. I intend to post one or two of those in the next day or two.

    And finally, since this post seems to have evolved into another discussion on photography, I’m buying myself a Christmas present today – a new camera lens. I mentioned before that I really want to reduce the amount of gear I bring along on each trip. The camera backpack I lugged around in airports this past trip weighed in at 20lbs. That did not seem so bad on the trip down to Ushuiai, but seemed to weigh even more on the way back, as I dragged my tired body through seemingly miles of airport corridors. I also want to avoid having to carry two cameras on hikes if at all possible. It was really difficult managing two heavy cameras/lenses while stumbling around on the snow and ice when we were visiting the penguin colonies – we were not allowed to put anything on the snow, so I had to have someone hold my pack while I switched cameras. Awkward at best. 

    I’m hoping that the Tamron 25-200 lens will become my go-to for most on-shore activities, and only travel with that and the 150-500 lens. And then there is the Baja trip in February – we are limited to 6.5 pounds for carry-on, and 30 pounds for the checked bag. The Sony A7R5 weighs 4.5 pounds with a lens, and my smallest camera bag weighs 2 pounds. I will likely only bring the new lens for this trip, and one camera body. Ouch. The GoPro will fit in my pocket, or in the duffel bag. And I will have my phone as well. If the grey whales do what they are supposed to (come up to the boats for a back rub), then I should not need the long lens.

    OK, enough geeky camera stuff. Here’s a couple of images from my recent review. Oh, and I will have a post or two before February – I’m heading off to the coast in January, to visit the elephant sea lion colony at the Ano Nuevo State Park. They have docent-led walks to watch the huge males fight during mating season. No penguins though.

    A since I mentioned it, short video clip, as we cruised through an ice field:

    And maybe a few images:

    A group of penguins walking on snow-covered ground, with a few scattered in the background.
    Two Gentoo penguins standing on snow, with others in the background.
    Three birds in flight against a clear blue sky.
    A whale's tail emerges from the water in front of an iceberg under a clear blue sky.
    A group of penguins swimming in icy waters beneath a glacier, with icicles hanging from the ice above.
    A whale surfacing in calm waters near a large glacier, with white and blue ice formations in the background.
    A serene view of an icy seascape with floating icebergs under a bright sun and a blue sky, reflecting light on calm waters.
    A snow-covered landscape with a large ice glacier in the background and several seals on the ice.
    Two Gentoo penguins standing on a rocky shoreline near the water.
    Two Gentoo penguins interacting on rocky terrain with patches of snow.
    A group of Gentoo penguins standing on rocky terrain, with some penguins vocalizing and others looking around in a snowy environment.
    A snowy landscape with a group of people in the distance and a lone penguin in the foreground.