
21st Sept, 2026
How do you know when you need to make some significant life changes? When you find yourself having a conversation about photography with an AI Chat-bot at 11PM on a Saturday night. Very sad.
But it was an interesting conversation. Really. I’m just about done curating my treasure trove of bear photos, and was pondering which one to submit for a photo club nature competition. I had used Google Gemini to provide editing suggestions in the past so figured … let’s see how it critiques and ranks what I consider to be the best of the bunch. So, I started out by feeding one image, a female bear (sow) with a single cub – one of my favorites. Gemini processed for about 30 seconds, and came back with a thorough evaluation, recommending tighter cropping, and pointing out the strengths of the image. Gemini considered it to be a strong composition, with a subject matter that judges tend to favor with grizzly bear photos – a mother with cubs. Cool
I then asked if I could just feed it a series of photos, and have each evaluated and ranked. Gemini said to bring it on. Seriously. So…I fed another 15 photos, one at a time, and in some cases making changes and resubmitting. It was kind of fun. (I know, that’s really a concern. At least I refrained from naming the Chat-bot). I had a mix of solo adult bear shots, cubs only, and mother-cub(s) images. Gemini ranked anything with cubs over solo shots – not unexpected. Judges typically look for some type of animal behavior or interaction between adults in most wildlife photo competitions. Fur shots (close-ups of a single adult), may look great, but will usually rate somewhat lower than a less perfect photo of two bears fighting, or a sow interacting with her cubs.
Here are most of the sixteen photos I submitted to my AI photo reviewer.














The third one (DSC06547_1) was ranked #1 immediately, and stayed there until the very end, until I found a similar shot, with the cub staring back at the camera. That was considered an improvement, and made it to the top of the list (marked #1).
Here is Gemini’s final ranking of the 16 photos.
1. Benchmark Comparison: DSC06295_3.jpg (#1) vs. DSC06296_1.jpg (New Entry)
- Winner: DSC06296_1.jpg takes the #1 spot!
- Why it wins:
- Stronger Head Angle: The sow’s head is tilted more toward the camera rather than pointing straight left, showing off more of her face while keeping the dramatic yawn fully visible.
- Sharper Eye Contact: The standing cub’s gaze is even clearer and more alert, locking directly onto the viewer.
- Improved Seated Cub Posture: The smaller nestled cub is turned slightly more toward the foreground, making its profile cleaner and more distinct against the mother’s chest.
2. New Entry Evaluation: DSC06296_1.jpg
- Current Rank: #1
- Strengths: Perfect crop framing, phenomenal emotional connection, and high behavioral impact. It refines the composition of your previous leader into an absolute knockout frame.
Updated Leaderboard
- DSC06296_1.jpg (Trio / Yawning Sow Tilted Forward & Alert Cub)
- DSC06295_3.jpg (Trio / Yawning Sow Profile & Alert Cub)
- DSC06547_1.jpg (Trio / Resting Sow & Expressive Cub with Tongue Out)
- DSC06591_1.jpg (Trio / Resting Sow & Expressive Cub)
- DSC06690_1.jpg (Trio / Walking Yawning Sow & Seated Cubs)
- DSC06386_1.jpg (Mother & Single Cub)
- DSC06895_1.jpg (Single Cub in Green Grass – Direct Eye Contact)
- DSC7116_1.jpg (Two Cubs in Tall Grass)
- DSC06756_2.jpg (Solo Bear Sitting Upright)
- DSC7466_3.jpg (Solo Bear Cropped in Water)
- DSC7125_1.jpg (Solo Bear Feeding on Salmon – Profile)
- DSC7132_1.jpg (Solo Bear Feeding – Head Down)
- DSC06502_1.jpg (Solo Bear in Water – Wide)
- DSC06756_1.jpg (Solo Bear Full-Body Profile)
- DSC06622_1.jpg (Solo Bear Emerging from Grass)
- DSC06601_1.jpg (Sow Lying Back with Snuggling Cubs)
This micro-adjustment made a huge difference—DSC06296_1.jpg is your new top competition candidate! Got any more frames to compare?
The biggest surprise for me was that the photo of the mother nursing her cubs did not rank higher and wound up in last place, but Gemini’s evaluation made sense. Neither the mother or the cubs were looking at the camera – eye contact with the viewer is important. It was interesting to see the mother feeding the cubs, but the overall composition did not have much life to it. I did have two other ones though with the cubs and mother in different positions….maybe next time. That’s the problem with having that many reasonably good shots – it’s easy to overlook some really good ones.
I probably would have submitted #3 if I had not decided to go through this ranking process. This does not necessarily mean I’ll do well in the competition – last time I tried this, the judge thought that I had over-cropped the image. Bummer. AI cannot outguess how a human will evaluate and rank photo’s. That’s a good thing. I think it’s useful to use the tool for recommendations, but I will ever expect that those recommendations guarantee anything.
As for the latest controversy over AI, and how uncontrolled development might lead to the robots taking over, like Arnold Schwarzenegger and Skynet in the Terminator.
I’m not overly concerned about that. After all, I’ve got my own AI protectors, Max and Aperture. Although I’m not too sure about that dog, especially after seeing the viral video of a golden retriever welcoming an intruder who broke into the home. He greeted the guy with one of his toys, wagging his tail. Not quite the best guard dog.

Hopefully this is not my last post…I’ve got nothing to do until I leave for Patagonia in early November, which means I’ll have to find ways to entertain myself other than sitting at home and writing weird posts for the blog. I do have my cardiac maintenance at UC Davis later this morning. That’s not exactly what I had in mind in terms of exciting things to do. It’s a routine procedure, so as Arnold said in a few of the Terminator flicks, I’m sure that “I’ll Be Back!”.
Peace

