Tag: sony-cameras

  • Kodiak Day 3 – A Hard Lesson

    A brown bear walking along a riverbank with green foliage in the background.

    August 27th, 2026

    Today is the 28th – this will be my last day of internet for four days, since we are flying out on the float plane to join the Ursus, our home away from home while we go on shore to photograph the bears. 

    Yesterday was a beautiful day in Kodiak, perfect weather with great opportunities for photography. I enjoyed the day, but had one of those hard lessons when it comes to photography gear. I know I’ve written about some of the gear I’ve bought since I started traveling – two new Sony cameras, which I’ve been really pleased with (but are now obsolete), and two long lenses. I struggled buying both of those – for the longer lens, 200-600MM, I had intended to buy the latest from Sony, but after seeing photographers struggle with the size and weight in crowded Zodiac boats, I thought it might be best to get something a bit more compact, and wound up with a Tamron 150-500MM. That worked out well for me in Antarctica. Then I decided I needed something a bit lighter and more compact for trips like Iceland, where I probably would not be photographing wildlife. Once again, I chose another Tamron lens based on the weight. It worked out sort of OK on that trip, although I wished that I had a longer lens for photographing the puffins. 

    Well, yesterday those decisions came back to haunt me. I brought along the Tamron 50-400, based on what one of the Natural Habitat experts said on a Zoom call – we will be so close to the bears that you do not need a long lens. Unfortunately yesterday, I did. We started our day, with perfect weather, on a small boat wildlife cruise in the waters around Kodiak – aside from whales, there are otters and a variety of birds, including my personal favorites, puffins. We did see a lot of them, but never close enough for my pitifully small 400mm lens. My soon-to-be roommate on the Ursus has a 400-800mm Sony lens, and captured some incredible shots of the puffins, one in flight carrying a bunch of fish. A classic shot for these birds. I came away with zilch. The same goes for the otters. I really needed a 600mm, or a teleconverter which boosts the reach (1.4 or 1.6X). Sony makes one of those, but only for Sony lenses. There are also a lot of features you only get when hooking up Sony lenses to Sony cameras which are useful for serious photography. 

    Our second outing of the day also hit home on making better choices on what lenses to buy and to bring along on trips. We drove around some of the local river parks, looking for bears – the salmon run is in full gear now, and the rivers are packed with salmon….and fishermen. The bears try to avoid people, which is a good thing – there’s a lot of room in the rivers, and plenty of fish to go around. We hiked in and spotted a bear that was heading to the river, and then followed it upstream to spot where we could hopefully photograph it feeding. We never got too close, and it was an awkward spot, so I never got the monopod hooked up. I did get one or two OK shots, but the majority were a bit blurred. The bear got annoyed with all the people, and headed off to the woods after a few minutes. Darn. A longer Sony lens would have been better for this situation – better stabilization, and more reach.

    I did get some nice shots of a juvenile bald eagle when the boat returned to the harbor – there’s nothing wrong with the lens, it’s great for some situations. Just not for distant puffins. 

    A juvenile eagle perched among lush green foliage, with its beak open as if calling out.

    I’m not disappointed at all – it was a fun day, got to see some amazing scenery, lots of wildlife, and my first look at the Kodiak bears. Every trip is a learning experience. I think I’ll be buying myself a Christmas present from my favorite camera store this year. 

    Peace

    Can’t beat the scenery here….

  • Keep On Keepin’ On

    “The only thing I knew how to do”
    “was to keep on keeping on”
    Tangled up in Blue, Bob Dylan

    May 10th, 2026

    This post started out as a personal whine about aging, and morphed into a composite of those strange thoughts that randomly bounce around in my head, along with some geeky hiking and photography stuff. Sorry, the blog is my replacement for having someone to talk to in the morning.

    Maybe I really should get a Golden Retriever. They are good listeners, as long as you have snacks in your hand. 

    A man sitting in a chair with a mug talking to a golden retriever in a living room, featuring comfortable furniture and a coffee table with books and candles.
    How did this guy and his dog get in my house?

    One of the problems with being ancient is that the damage from all the sports and dangerous activities we undertake through the years is cumulative. The human body was designed for hunting and gathering, and has not really evolved much beyond that in the last million or so years. Eventually, parts of our bodies wear out – knees can only take so much abuse from running, basketball, tennis and other fast movement sports. Shoulders are the same, especially for baseball and racket sports. How many tennis players do you know who have had one or two shoulder surgeries? I’ve had one, and I suck at the sport. Broken bones in various parts of your body  can lead to painful arthritis as you age. I’ve broken lots of bones, which complain most every morning, especially when the weather turns cold and damp. Hips wear out from a number of activities. Maybe sometime in the far distant future, there will be a sub-species or two – the current Homo Sapiens, sort of the generic person still limping along in their 70’s, a new and improved model,  Homo sapiens athleticus, and then maybe one at the other end of the spectrum, Homo sapiens couchpotato, sort of a cross between a human and golden retriever.

    The good news is that while our bodies may not have evolved, our big brains (for some of us at least) have come up with replacements for a lot of the parts that wear out – sort of like replacing worn out parts in your car – an Autozone for the over achievers in athletics. It seems like so many of the tennis and pickleball players out on the court have one or two replacement parts – knees, hips or shoulders. Heck, some people have replacement heart valves and are still motoring along. 

    I’ve done all kinds of damage to my body, but somehow or another, I have avoided having anything replaced so far. That’s not necessarily a good thing – I wish one of my knees was wrecked enough to replace. But with my usual bad luck, I’ve inherited a wonky nervous system from my mother, and have something that cannot be fixed with a replacement part. Nerves. 

    I was diagnosed some time ago with idiopathic peripheral neuropathy, a condition where the long nerves in the legs degenerate (and arms too), misfire, and eventually stop working. I already wrote about this condition in a previous post, so I won’t bore you with details, just that the neurologists have no clue what causes it, or how to cure it. Lucky me. I currently have issues with mobility and balance, which are not going to improve, and will continue to get worse over time.

    I have to be extremely careful hiking, and have opted out of more difficult hikes on the last few National Geographic trips. The night time photo shoots in Arches National Park were a bit frightening for me, since my balance was way off in the dark, especially when we had to hike to rocky, awkward setups for our gear. I wound up holding on to the tripod most of the time, to have a point of reference. 

    This year, I should be OK with the remaining trips – only two have significant hiking, all of which are in the daylight and on flat terrain. Running away from the Kodiak bears might be an issue though.

    Next year may be more problematic as a few of the trips have some moderately difficult hikes. I have yet to book any trips for 2028 – there are quite a few I’d like to schedule, but I have to think about what my physical limitations might be in a few years. Bummer. Switching to Viking river cruises is not the answer for me. I’ve had to give up drinking wine and martinis – I’m not giving up on travel. My bucket list does not seem to be getting any smaller since I keep finding new, interesting places to go to. 

    But, there is a non-surgical, potential solution to my problem – not replacement parts, but body augmentation! I give you…..

    …..The Robo-Traveling-Widower!!!!

    An elderly man wearing an exoskeleton and hiking gear walks along a rocky mountain path with a golden retriever dog, surrounded by a scenic landscape of mountains and trees.

    I’m serious about this. There are a couple of companies which are developing exoskeletons and one or two are already available. One in particular, the Hypershell from a company of the same name (https://hypershell.tech/en-us), might be something I look into as the wonkiness in my legs progresses. It’s sort of like an electric bike – it provides extra oomph to your legs when you need it. The top-end version is light weight (carbon fiber), with a small battery pack, that can handle up to a 30km hike, which is much further than I walk/hike on a given day. For $1800, it would be worth it to keep me on the trails. 

    For now, I’ll just rely on my latest REI purchase for hiking stability, collapsible carbon-fiber hiking sticks from Black Diamond. Yes, I now have four sets of sticks (one was my wife’s). I’ve been jamming a pair of heavier, aluminum poles in luggage on most of my trips, and I’m  desperately trying to lighten my load for the next trips. The new sticks are like tent-poles – they split into 3 connected segments, and take up much less room. New toys from REI.

    Adjustable trekking poles with blue accents, placed on a textured gray surface.

    And while I’m on the topic of reducing my luggage weight, I was depressed the other day, so flipped a coin as to where I should go shopping – REI or Mike’s Camera. That always cheers me up. Seriously, I had been considering buying yet another lens for some of my upcoming trips. I currently rely on two lenses – the new 25-200mm Tamron lens for most everything other than wildlife (all the rose garden photos were shot with that), and the big 150-500mm for wildlife. But, there are trips where I don’t really need the reach of the 500mm – the Natural Habitat lead for the Kodiak trip said you only need a big lens if you want to get a picture of a bear eye ball. I decided maybe I need something in-between, like a 100-400mm lens. As it turns out, Sony has that lens, and Tamron has a 50-400 for half the price. Off I went to my favorite camera store (only one in this area) to compare the two. Fortunately, this also happened to be the day Mike’s Camera has their annual sale, and had rep’s from all the major manufacturers in the store. They brought out both lenses for me – the Sony was over a pound heavier, and was older technology. Easy decision to make. My camera closet is getting crowded with gear. 

    But now I’ll be a bit faster with less to carry, when I have a Kodiak bear chasing after me.

    A man running along a beach, holding a camera, as a large grizzly bear charges toward him. The scene is set against a backdrop of mountains and a forested area.
    Run Forest, Run!!!

    I’m so excited about that trip.

    Peace (I hope)